Because I oppose any attempt to speed up traffic flow through the center of town simply to avoid a few minutes’ travel delay, with a resultant loss of the walking/biking lanes, the increased safety risk to the many children who cross Main Street there, and the harm to be suffered to homeowners’ property, I attended a Town Council “questions” session. There I was given clear and complete responses and I was assured that the project did not have the support of the town manager or the council. However, because the “project manager” had already submitted a proposal to the Department of Transportation, with a request that consideration be “expedited” (a request DOT denied), I understand that the project will nevertheless be considered, as the district has not withdrawn it.
Who would have known that responsibility for the town’s street management off of school property would be governed and directed by the superintendent and the school board? Although they do a very fine job educating our children, their collective experience with property acquisition and development has been quite troubled.
Greg Smith
Cumberland
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less