Chief Seattle reminds us that “we do not own the land.” We should be good stewards of the land. The proposed wetland setbacks are considered “bare minimum” and yet there is wringing of the hands, complaints of lost revenue, degraded property value and growth zone.
We have disregarded Chief Seattle’s reminder that we are not the sole inhabitants of the land. Birds, animals and vegetation depend on the marshland. The last costly January storms, flooding, and destruction are long forgotten. The proposed wetland setback helps to provide a buffer for the land. A buffer from future storms that impact our pocketbooks and the land. Move forward on the “bare minimum” wetland setback. Remember the lessons from Chief Seattle.
Marilyn Fraktman
Scarborough
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less