School project needs time out
To the editor,
As Scarborough Superintendent Bruno reported in the recent installment of “School Stories,” the just-released school enrollment projection indicates the Town will need to increase school capacity soon. This should have surprised no one, in view of the blank check given developers over the last five years. The piper must be paid.
The distressing assertion in the Superintendent’s report is that the enrollment study somehow justified the need for a 1,000-plus student mega-school for Kindergarten through third grade, as opposed to a solution that maintains the three existing neighborhood schools. The enrollment study reached no such conclusion.
Yes, more K-3 capacity is needed, but, no, the mega-school solution has not been proven to be the only or best solution. Whether the neighborhood schools should be abandoned is an open question for many residents.
And there are many other important questions that remain unanswered about the proposed school project, such as: Where would a new school be located? (That critical decision is now three months overdue.) Why is the early cost estimate of our proposed school $134,000 per student while that of a similarly sized school in Saco is $76,000 per student? Indeed, the Town Council has assembled a list of 74 questions about the school project. If those questions have been answered, the public has not yet seen them.
It’s time for the School Building Committee to acknowledge that a November referendum date is no longer realistic and that several serious concerns need to be resolved before the project goes any further.
Steve Hanly
Scarborough
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less