The Yarmouth Town Council seeks to overturn a charter amendment that was overwhelmingly approved by the voters in 2018, and affirmed in a court challenge. The court’s opinion validated the importance of the amendment’s provisions.
The council’s motivation in sending the matter to the voters is now premised on “inclusion.” However, the process by which the question has made its way to the ballot is troubling, and was anything but inclusive.
Council Chairperson Timothy Shannon spoke eloquently to that point 53 minutes into the Sept. 15 Town Council meeting, and voted not to move the question to the voters. Councilor Shannon’s remarks speak to what is most important for good governance: the participation of the residents in the process. The process that brings this question to the voters was anything but inclusive.
I urge you to vote no on the charter amendment.
Richard Plourde
Yarmouth
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less