The House and Senate are now in recess, and are scheduled to return to session only after the early November elections.
HOUSE VOTES
CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS: The House has agreed to the Senate amendment to the Continuing Appropriations and Ukraine Supplemental Appropriations Act (H.R. 6833), sponsored by Rep. Angie Craig, D-Minn., to provide continuing appropriations for government spending through Dec. 16, and add $12.3 billion of aid to Ukraine in its war with Russia, as well as increase funding for disaster response programs. A supporter, Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro, D-Conn., said the bill was necessary “to avoid disruptions to vital federal agencies, to help communities get back on their feet, and to ensure we have the time needed to negotiate a final funding agreement that meets the needs of hardworking people.” An opponent, Rep. Kay Granger, R-Texas, criticized the bill’s failure to address border, energy, and inflation problems, including its “nearly $2 billion in funding for children and families flooding the border.” The vote, on Sept. 30, was 230 yeas to 201 nays.
YEAS: Chellie Pingree, D-1st District; Jared Golden, D-2nd District
SEPTEMBER 11 ATTACKS: The House has passed the Fairness for 9/11 Families Act (H.R. 8987), sponsored by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., to fund one-time payments to a group of relatives of people killed in the September 11, 2001, attacks. Nadler said the bill was a needed correction of a mistake whereby some relatives of those killed had not received payments from the United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Fund, because of receiving payments from the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund. The vote, on Sept. 30, was 400 yeas to 31 nays.
YEAS: Pingree, Golden
There were no key votes in the Senate last week.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less