As a Democrat, a Republican and an unenrolled lawmaker, we don’t always see eye-to-eye. But last session, there was one bill we all agreed was of the utmost importance, and that was LD 194, “An Act To Prohibit Contributions, Expenditures and Participation by Foreign Government-owned Entities To Influence Referenda.”
The bill initially received broad bipartisan support, but unfortunately, it fell prey to a veto by just one vote after an extensive lobbying effort by foreign-owned businesses looking to protect their bottom line from the will of Maine voters.
As a result, Mainers just endured $24 million in ads funded by the taxpayers of another country. This interference occurred legally even though the very same company is strictly prohibited from influencing candidate elections.
We agree that it’s wrong that referendums directly initiated by Maine voters aren’t safeguarded against foreign interference. If the people of Maine feel strongly enough about a matter to initiate a statewide vote, we ought to ensure that the process is safeguarded against foreign governments seeking to put the will of their voters ahead of ours.
Thankfully, this important matter didn’t die with LD 194. Our colleague, Senator Rick Bennett, has taken out paperwork to initiate a statewide vote. The movement is called Protect Maine Elections, and it has volunteers all across the state collecting signatures today.
Referendums initiated by Mainers shouldn’t be subjected to big spending by foreign governments. We hope you will seek out a volunteer to sign today to support this important movement.
Rep. Charlotte Warren, D-Hallowell; Rep. Patrick Corey, R-Windham; Rep. Jeff Evangelos, independent, Friendship
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less