CMP has been trying to buy Mainers’ approval of their wildly unpopular corridor project by spouting claims that the retroactive piece of the November referendum question isn’t legal or fair.
However, CMP knowingly entered into an illegal lease, crossing public lands prior to having all of their permits. And that lease has now been revoked. So, retroactively requiring a two-thirds vote from the Legislature on a new public lands lease and on construction of any high-impact electric transmission lines is the right thing to do. Any construction done now is at their own risk.
CMP knows their project is in jeopardy, not only because 80,000 Mainers signed the petition to get the corridor on the ballot so that we can finally have our voices heard, but also the courts and the Legislature have declared their permit to construct on our public lands unconstitutional. And yet CMP is currently bulldozing and clearcutting their way through this project to get as much done as they can before the election and before the Department of Environmental Protection decides to suspend the rest of their permits. Mainers should be aware of the devastation currently taking place in the Upper Kennebec Valley and all along the proposed route that connects us from Canada to Massachusetts.
What will future generations have to say about this project? “Thank you for killing the recreational opportunities we lost out on. Thank you for warming our waters to the point of killing the lobster industry.” Need I go on?
Vote Yes on Question 1 to stop CMP and their constant disregard for the good people of Maine.
Cathy Whorf
Windham
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less