BOSTON — The Boston area’s subway system faces a severe threat from rising seas over the next 50 years that could cause flooding and cut critical links around the city, according to a new study.
The report, written by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Tulane University, said the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority must take sweeping action to fortify its coastal infrastructure, The Boston Globe reported Tuesday.
“Severe flooding is a grave challenge for the T,” said Michael Martello, a researcher with MIT’s Transit Lab and lead author of the report, which was commissioned by the MBTA.
The study is scheduled for publication next month in the journal Transportation Research. It used sea level rise projections to determine what segments of the system’s four major subway lines might be most affected by floodwaters from a major storm.
A 100-year storm would completely inundate the Blue Line and large portions of the Red and Orange lines by 2030, researchers found. By 2070, a 100-year storm would flood nearly the entire network.
“It’s not a pretty picture,” said Jesse Keenan, a Tulane professor who studies the intersection of climate change and infrastructure and co-authored the research.
Hannah Lyons-Galante, the MBTA’s climate change resiliency specialist, said the findings were informative, but not surprising.
The MBTA is working on long-term plans to protect the transit network from rising seas, she said.
In response to the threat, the MBTA has directed nearly $2 million to a number of short-term projects they hope will prevent flooding on the Blue Line. But the scope of the problem demands more long-term and expensive solutions, experts said.
Failing to address the issue could have a negative impact on the economy of the city.
“If you do not do this, you’re going to lose businesses and jobs, you’re going to lose tenants, you’re going to lose taxpayers, you’re going to lose economic activity. People need to get to work,” Keenan said.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less