Following the perusal of John Balentine’s opinion piece (“Post-pandemic depression rears its ugly head,” July 16), I became rather depressed.
Why? How many mores times must he rail about the same topics, always providing us with lies and Republican Party-based propaganda, especially when he is presented with real alternatives, i.e., numerous, fact-based and articulate responses issued by readers of The Forecaster?
Mr. Balentine admits: “I’m no psychologist.” Indeed, neither is he a scientist, health care professional, historian or thoughtful individual. If he attained the knowledge these aforementioned individuals possess, his view that “Many have realized they no longer trust … any of our other critical institutions in general,” would be shown to be completely false. Why?
Despite Mr. Balentine’s misguided concept of civic duty (see my letter: “Balentine, GOP obsessed with individual freedom,” July 9), scientists, local/state/national governments, churches, police departments and the media (not Fox News) all undertook important roles in safeguarding the public against COVID-19. One might ask how many lives were saved from COVID-19 by these named groups and institutions who honored the true meaning of collective (not individual) freedom by implementing lockdowns and mandating social distancing protocols to protect all citizens. Answer: thousands of lives saved! If we followed Mr. Balentine’s beliefs, it would be better to die than wear a mask!
Speaking of masks and vaccinations, Tucker Carlson and his cohorts on Fox News have offered “alternative facts” (e.g., vaccines are dangerous, contain magnetic beads/microchips, etc.). However, they fail to mention that 99% of all new COVID-19 infections are associated with individuals who have not been vaccinated. Go figure!
Want a “cure” for post-pandemic depression? First and foremost, trust experts who are dedicated to ensuring your well-being. Second, and equally germane, educate yourself and trust your own common sense.
John M. Mishler
Harpswell
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less