John Balentine must live a rather unique and self-reliant life, i.e., never requiring any advice, assistance or financial help from local, state or federal governments. As a Trump Republican, he believes those who do rely on governments cannot function without such intervention (“Panics over, get back to work,” May 21).
In his protective “bubble,” he writes: “… thanks to … ‘enhanced unemployment assistance’ provided by President Joe Biden’s American Rescue Plan” … “the unemployed have become rich indeed in this … mad COVID world” … because … “the government encourages healthy, but lazy, people to skip work.”
For those individuals who reside in the real world, governments can offer life-supporting mechanisms when uncontrollable events dictate and influence their lives. During my own working career, I required and utilized state-provided unemployment assistance. During those times, I was “healthy” but unlucky. That unemployment assistance money allowed me to seek other job opportunities without placing my family at risk.
Therefore, given my personal history, I should like to issue you, Mr. Balentine, this challenge: Let us compare our curricula vitae. We are both “healthy.” You apparently never required any help from a government (living in your self-reliant bubble), but I have lived in a real and unpredictable world.
Although I was given assistance from the government, said aid never made me lazy or rich, as you can judge when comparing our careers. Having a safety net (provided by the government) allowed me to undertake certain risks I would normally not have taken. However, you and Trump Republicans seem to equate government support with laziness. Not true. At times, support from the government is needed to provide a safety net for those unfortunate but hardworking Americans, even including some Trump Republicans.
FYI: Gas shortages were created by a Russian troll farm!
John M. Mishler
Harpswell
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less