In a March 6 commentary, Sarah Leighton of Sierra Club Maine advocated for the electrification of our heating systems to reduce the use of fossil fuel, which is fine. However, this is the same Sierra Club chapter that is working side by side with the fossil fuel industry to stop New England Clean Energy Connect, which would replace 1,200 megawatts (the capacity of the Seabrook nuclear plant) of fossil fuel-generated electricity.
Because of the intermittent power of solar and wind, lithium battery storage and fossil fuel will be required to meet demand. Lithium extraction has similar environmental impact as fracked natural gas. In Chile’s Salar de Atacama region, lithium extraction consumes 65 percent of the region’s water supply, which has had a major impact on local farming. Would the Sierra Club’s Maine chapter support lithium extraction in Maine?
If we want to electrify our heating system, and do it without fossil fuels, we are going to need hydro to work in tandem with solar and wind. New England Clean Energy Connect will help get us there. I will go even further and say that the state of Maine should be reaching out to Canada to see what we can do to get connected to the Atlantic Loop proposal. According to a study released last year by the MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, building two-way power flow between Canada and New England would help accomplish our carbon-free goals.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less