For myself, and I’m sure for many of my fellow Mainers, Maine’s natural land is its most precious. We rely so heavily on the stability of this land for the natural resources that are the foundation of Maine’s economy. Protecting our lands and resources is crucial, whether you’re in tourism, outdoor recreation, lobster or lumber.
Growing up in Maine, I’ve also had the great privilege to see and experience the beauty that Maine is famous for: Baxter State Park, Casco Bay, Moosehead Lake, Acadia and more. However, we are already seeing the drastic consequences of the global climate crisis. New England is warming faster than any other region in the lower 48 United States. Scientists are urging us to conserve at least 30% of land and the ocean by 2030, both to help combat the climate crisis by preserving carbon sinks and to reverse the decline of America’s wildlife, waterways and natural places. Approximately 21% of land in Maine is permanently conserved, but we’re losing 10,000 acres of forest to development each year.
Maine voters overwhelmingly agree on the need to protect our beautiful lands and waters and that is reflected in the prominence of this 30% by 2030 goal in Maine’s new climate action plan. But in order to protect our wild places and the industries that rely on them, the Maine Legislature must fully fund the Land for Maine’s Future Fund. Now is the time to turn goals into action.
Alexandra Shapiro
Falmouth
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less