PORTLAND — City voters handily approved referendums that would incrementally increase the minimum wage in the city, ban the use of facial recognition technology by city officials, implement a Green New Deal in Portland, cap rent increases for tenants and make changes to the city’s retail marijuana rules. Voters rejected a referendum that sought to restrict short term rentals.
Close to 60% of the voters approved the measure to increase the city’s minimum wage to $15 and close 65% of voters approved the facial recognition technology ban.
About 57% of voters approved Portland’s Green New Deal measure that requires the city to use more up-to-date green building standards, monitor fossil fuel use and create more affordable housing.
About 53% of voters supported a change in marijuana rules that would eliminate the cap of 20 retail stores and reduce the distance between establishments from 250 feet to 100 feet.
A measure to eliminate non-owner occupied short term rentals on the mainland and increase the annual registration fee to $1,000 was rejected by 52% of voters.
All of the referendums, outside the marijuana rule changes, were backed by People First Portland, but were opposed by many on the council and in the business community.
In total, 41,396 individuals, or two-thirds of registered voters, cast ballots in Tuesday’s election, including 31,07, or close to 75 % by absentee ballot.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less