NEW GLOUCESTER — New Gloucester voters on Tuesday approved establishing a commission for the creation of a town charter, with 1,922 voting in favor the measure and 1,580 against.
This is the second time residents weighed-in on the question of establishing a charter commission; the first vote taken in 2018 failed by just four votes.
This time around, the affirmative votes bested those who disapproved by 342 ballots.
The group New Gloucester Citizens for a Town Charter submitted a petition with 648 signatures in June that met the minimum requirement of 587 signatures by June 27 for the question to appear on Tuesday’s ballot.
Supporters of a town charter say that it will give residents more oversight of their local government and increase transparency in town affairs.
“I think it’ll be a huge asset to the town,” Town Manager Brenda Fox-Howard said in an interview last month.
At New Gloucester’s polling location at the fire department Tuesday morning, most voters questioned said the presidential election was what drove them to the polls that day. One voter said he didn’t even know the charter question would be on the ballot until he started voting.
Although there was a steady stream of in-person voters on Election Day, registrar Kimberly Getchell reported mid-October that the town had already received about 1,500 absentee ballot requests and the number continued to climb.
The final number of absentee ballot requests was not available Wednesday morning.
John Salisbury, an organizer with Citizens for a Town Charter and former executive director of the Maine Municipal Association, wrote on the group’s Facebook page: “Thanks to all who worked hard to make this happen. Also those who voted in support of creating a charter commission.”
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less