
SCARBOROUGH — Cell service is an ongoing concern for residents in Scarborough, and the communications tower installed at the new Public Safety Building has space for up to five wireless carriers that could improve service.
Although the capacity is there, no leases have yet materialized, Town Manager Tom Hall said in an email. However, the town has a broker soliciting deals.
The town’s ordinance requires a co-location of wireless and cell providers, he said, and the new Public Safety Building was constructed to accommodate a tower.
“Our local ordinance requires ‘co-location’ of providers on existing towers so as to limit the number of towers we have in the community so it made sense to build the new tower with this capability,” Hall said. “In addition, we see this as an opportunity to generate revenue for the town.”
Hall said that since he started working in Scarborough, cell service has been an issue for residents.
“I’m a little surprised that we hadn’t secured leases already,” he said. “The ordinance I referenced is pretty fairly stringent. There aren’t many locations, so my expectation was this would be a fairly valuable location. So I can’t explain why we haven’t had interest so far, but we’re still looking.”
Departments began occupying the new Public Safety Building, which is adjacent to Town Hall at 275 US Route 1, in April and May of 2020.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less