FALMOUTH — Two controversial residential projects saw final approvals at the June 2 Planning Board meeting.
Residents spoke out at meetings for both projects over the past months, arguing they do not fit the character of the town or would pose a burden on traffic.
“I feel this project is too big, too much traffic and too dense,” Stephen Dyer said at the May 5 meeting about Homestead. “The (zoning map) calls this commercial growth, this area is for commercial projects.”
Homestead Acres, a 68-unit condominium complex off of Gray and Mountain roads, was approved 4-1. David Sinnett, who had previously argued along with residents that the project did not fit, voted against the proposal.
Before starting construction, Homestead developers must meet conditions that include 325 feet of sight distance while looking left on Mountain Road. A traffic study of the Gray Road access must be conducted when the project is 100% occupied if it is within three years or when 75% of the development is occupied.
Town planner Dawn Emerson said developer David Chase will be able to begin construction as soon as requirements are met and workers are already “mowing the open space” to prepare the project for earth work.
The board also approved the Meadow Winds project 4-2, with Sinnett and member Joel Kallich against.
“Every time we look at the Comprehensive Plan we get a clearer distinction this is intended to be a commercial area and not residential,” resident Lee Hantchett said about Meadow Winds at a May 12 meeting.
The 20 units near 100 Gray Road will be split among 10 duplexes or two bedrooms each. Each unit in the one-story building will encompass approximately 1,800 square feet of living space, a basement and two-car garage, with room for a terrace or porch.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less