June 2, 1851: Gov. John Hubbard signs what becomes known as the Maine Law, which bans the sale of alcoholic beverages except for “medicinal, mechanical, or manufacturing purposes.”
The law, for which Portland Mayor Neal Dow lobbied furiously, also includes a search-and-seizure provision that enables any three voters to obtain a search warrant if they suspect someone of selling liquor.
The bill’s enactment prompts some to nickname Dow the “the Napoleon of Temperance,” but it also earns him many enemies.

Dow travels for three years after that as a temperance crusader in other states and Canada. Versions of the Maine Law are enacted in Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Rhode Island and Vermont.
Maine’s groundbreaking prohibition law engenders the Portland Rum Riot on June 2, 1855, in which one person dies and several are injured, leading to the law’s repeal in 1856. Later, similar bills become law, however, and prohibition is added to the state constitution in 1884.
The Rum Riots and their legislative aftermath foreshadow the national debate over Prohibition in the early 20th century.
June 2, 2017: Augusta City Center, the city’s principal government building, closes unexpectedly early when an unhappy visitor dumps a cup full of about 100 live bedbugs on a counter about 2 p.m. in one of the offices.

The city evacuates the building and summons an insect-control specialist.
Officials said the bug carrier came to City Center to seek General Assistance money. When he was told he didn’t qualify, they said, he unleashed the bugs.
Weeks later, police charge a 74-year-old city resident with assault and obstruction of government administration in connection with the incident.
Presented by:
Joseph Owen is an author, retired newspaper editor and board member of the Kennebec Historical Society. Owen’s book, “This Day in Maine,” can be ordered at islandportpress.com. Joe can be contacted at: jowen@mainetoday.com.


Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less