Reading John Balentine’s “Lockdown madness must end” (April 24) was just sad on so many levels – the lack of science behind the assertion of herd immunity, the callousness of indefinitely quarantining older people (more than 20% of our population in Maine) so that out-of-state tourists (from states with far greater risks of COVID-19 exposure) can vacation in a “safe zone,” the total trust in a federal response that has been conspicuous by its absence.
Herd immunity requires that at least 60 percent of a population is exposed to the pathogen – in Maine’s case that would be 807,500 positive cases and, with our current death rate as a model, more than 38,000 deaths. If Mr. Balentine is comfortable with that, he is beyond any rational response I can offer.
Catherine DiPietro
Bridgton
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less