With reference to John Balentine’s column in the Nov. 22 Forecaster, his basic premise is quite correct that the citizenry should willingly consent to be governed to avoid “discordant calamity.” However, he seems ignorant of recent history and is now seeing it repeated.
Almost immediately after Barack Obama was inaugurated, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell proclaimed that the Republicans would oppose every initiative that President Obama proposed. For eight years they did just that without ever proposing alternatives for consideration. A situation that comes immediately to mind is the Affordable Care Act, with which the Republicans refused to cooperate in crafting and then railed continuously against its provisions once it became law. To this date, they have failed to put forward an acceptable replacement to Obamacare.
While the current Democrats’ reaction in Congress to President Trump is inappropriate and mimics the Republicans’ former behavior toward President Obama, the latter’s behavior is conveniently ignored by Trump supporters such as columnist Balentine. While the Democrats have lowered themselves to the deplorable behavioral level of the Republicans, they at least have offered counter-proposals in Congress to Trump’s initiatives. That may be small solace for voters to the Democrats otherwise childish resistance to everything Trump, but it does seem to indicate some effort to govern.
Warner Price
Harpswell
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less