The Portland Press Herald recently published two letters (“Teens, adults can combat climate change by limiting consumption,” Sept. 20; “Take small steps on your own time to fight climate change,” Sept. 21) advocating consuming and traveling less, turning off lights when one leaves a room and other individual activities that will reduce carbon footprints and prove one’s seriousness about fighting climate change.
As well-intentioned as these letters are, let us put the issue in perspective. Without a global and national incentive for everybody – consumers, producers, governments – to reduce carbon emissions, we will not meet greenhouse-gas emission reduction targets that protect the planet from disastrous weather events and substantial economic damage.
A bipartisan bill now in the U.S. House, the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (HR 763), will provide economy-wide motivation. Under HR 763 a steadily rising fee is placed on the carbon content of fossil fuels. Facing continuously higher prices of goods containing carbon, consumers – families, businesses, governments, investors – conserve and find lower-carbon alternatives. HR 763 is progressive. It legislates that the revenues from the fee be sent back to American households on an equal basis as a carbon dividend. Lower- and middle-income families break even or do better under this climate policy. Importantly, HR 763 will meet greenhouse-gas emission reduction targets.
Thank U.S. Rep. Chellie Pingree for co-sponsoring HR 763. Ask Sens. Angus King and Susan Collins to support a similar bill in the Senate.
Dodie Jones
member, Citizens’ Climate Lobby, Bath-Brunswick Chapter
Brunswick
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less