Editor,
It seems some of the Biddeford citizens who attended the Sept. 10 city council meeting missed the point that the comprehensive parking plan proposed by the city is not chiefly for tourism or local business patronage. The planned 640-space garage is fundamentally aimed at accelerating the ongoing economic development of downtown Biddeford.
A garage would allow larger-scale businesses to consider locating downtown. In fact, City Manager Jim Bennett admitted that at least one employer that would have brought up to 200 good-paying jobs to Biddeford decided not to come here because our city does not have secure, consistent parking.
Further, as some at the meeting were very concerned with taxes, the garage will not be paid, at all, by property taxes. In fact, by creating the right business climate in Biddeford, the city can actually ensure a stable or decreased tax rate for homeowners. Creating hundreds of downtown parking spaces will encourage more large employers to locate in the city, and lessen the tax burden on ordinary families. If we want quality, high paying jobs for the people who live in our community, this infrastructure is desperately needed.
As we approach the election in November, I hope that Biddeford voters will keep these facts in mind, and will vote to support the incredible progress for our city that our Mayor, Alan Casavant, and other councilors have made.
Stephanie Edwards
Biddeford
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less