It came as no surprise for me to learn that, as a blonde, I am capable, not only of choosing five toppings on my pizza without becoming confused (more, when I’m feeling adventurous), but also to figure out which ice cream flavor, of 51, will satisfy my sweet tooth (sometimes I throw caution to the wind and order three flavors!).
My point: Even a ditzy blonde like me was able to figure out Maine‘s ranked-choice voting without becoming unhinged and dissolving into a puddle of tremulous insecurity as I cast my ballot.
It speaks volumes that the Republicans are trying to block ranked-choice, as they suppress votes and gerrymander themselves into office yet again. I would say the same of Democrats; however, they do not, unlike the Republicans, need to cheat to win.
The opposition to ranked-choice is that it deals fairly with third parties; all political parties, even the “Save the hedgehog” candidates, eliminating spoilers like Ralph Nader, Jill Stein and Eliot Cutler, to name a few who changed the course of history negatively.
Ranked-choice also has the benefit of neutralizing the unfairness of gerrymandering, defanging the archaic Electoral College and, most importantly, confusing Russian hackers who, once again, seek to destroy our democracy and throw it into yet more chaos than what our dear leader has already managed to accomplish with the assistance of adversarial foreign powers.
Carol Raney
Portland
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less