
“Thirteen” (Flatiron Books), by Steve Cavanagh
The tag line to Steve Cavanagh’s fourth novel about former con man turned defense lawyer Eddie Flynn is, on its own, tantalizing: “The serial killer isn’t on trial he’s on the jury.”
But Cavanagh’s “Thirteen” is no gimmick. It’s a superb action-packed story that melds the legal thriller with the serial killer subgenre, featuring intriguing character studies of both heroes and villains and a perceptive look at the legal system.
Eddie sees a lot of similarities between his old life as a con man and his career as a lawyer, especially in dealing with juries. But the main difference is that Eddie is now scrupulously honest, willing to take on anyone, including corrupt cops. As a result, his practice is rather low-rent. His apartment is his office, and he advertises on the side of a hot-dog cart. He’s stunned when high-powered attorney Rudy Carp wants him to join the team defending up-and-coming actor Bobby Solomon, who’s accused of killing his wife, the popular actress Ariella Bloom, and Carl Tozer, the couple’s chief of security. The victims were found murdered in bed in the actors’ Manhattan home.
Irish author Cavanagh nails the New York vibe while illustrating an affinity for American legalese. Cavanagh delves deep to show how Kane manipulates the jury and how he has stayed under the radar of law enforcement for years. The number 13 becomes a chilling totem as Eddie begins to put together evidence and clues. “Thirteen” seamlessly alternates from the viewpoints of Eddie and Kane. Cavanagh shows how the highly intelligent Kane became a killer, yet the author never wants the reader to feel empathy or sympathy for him. Kane’s self-assuredness makes him forget the rule of never conning a con man.
Sharp dialogue, court scenes that crackle, well-devised red herrings and deeply sculpted characters make “Thirteen” an outstanding thriller.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less