FOXBOROUGH, Mass. — Pick any test. Through five training camp practices, Maurice Harris has passed them all.
By the unofficial box score, he’s caught a team-high 10 passes during full-speed team periods, more than double any other wide receiver.
By the eye test, he’s run smooth routes, showcased strong hands and a widening catch radius.
Even by the Belichick press conference test, Harris has managed to draw rare praise from the tight-lipped, typically gruff coach.
Said Belichick on Monday: “He’s a smart guy. He’s learned well.”
While Julian Edelman sits out with a broken thumb, Harris has rapidly emerged as New England’s best available wideout. If he continues to ascend, the former Washington receiver will find himself alongside Edelman in the starting lineup.
But perhaps this time the Pats simply benefited from a blunder.
Harris signed his 1-year, $1 million contract in March only after Washington declined to tender him as a restricted free agent. Washington later drafted two wideouts to fill their sudden void at the position, but could have kept Harris for basically pennies.
Instead the 26-year-old hit the market, New England courted him and the two sides quickly struck a deal. Belichick and his staff had seen Harris up close during a preseason game the previous summer, then watched with the rest of the NFL as he broke out for a 10-catch, 124-yard outing in November. Harris finished with a career-high 28 receptions for 304 yards, scratching a previously unseen ceiling in the process.
Weeks later in Foxborough, he bugged backup quarterback Brian Hoyer to help him hit it again.
“Just from the day he got here, he was asking, ‘Hey, you wanna go throw in the bubble?’” Hoyer said. “He’s a guy who’s going to work extremely hard.”
Since training camp kicked off Thursday, Harris says his greatest growth has been mental. His grasp of the playbook is appreciably stronger than it was on Day 1 of training camp. But his work is far from finished.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less