Editor,
These days one might feel like we are living in some post-World War II dystopian novel. (Example: In Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, people employed by the fire department are not selfless public servants who extinguish destructive blazes. Instead, “firemen” are deployed by the state to go around burning any books they can find.)
In a move reminiscent of that ironic model, The EPA (The Environmental “Protection” Agency) has recently announced the final dismantling of the former administration’s “Clean Power Plan” – in order to prop up the declining coal industry. This, at a time when moving away from fossil fuels as energy sources as quickly as possible is what is needed to stave off the worst effects of Climate Change.
Since there is obviously no leadership from the White House on this issue, it is critical that Congress take the lead in pushing for effective solutions. And to effect real and lasting interventions for this crisis, this initiative must be a bipartisan effort.
Thankfully, there is a positive development regarding this. It is the Climate Solutions Caucus – which is a group of Republican and Democratic members of the House of Representatives who have volunteered to meet regularly and work together on solutions relating to Climate Change.
Hopefully, this Caucus will prove to the rest of Congress and to the country at large that Republicans and Democrats CAN work together effectively to solve problems that are of fundamental importance to the American people – and to the world. Kudos to Representative Chellie Pingree for supporting this effort.
Tom Berry
Kennebunk
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less