BOSTON — The University of New England nailed 10 of 16 three-point attempts after halftime to fend off Wentworth Institute of Technology for a 93-80 Commonwealth Coast Conference men’s basketball victory on Wednesday night at Tansey Gymnasium.
Now with the season sweep of WIT, the Nor’easters (7-18, 5-11 CCC) pull within a half-game of the Leopards (8-16, 5-10 CCC), who visit league-leading Nichols College to close out the regular season on Saturday. Between UNE, Wentworth, and Salve Regina University (4-11 CCC) — which plays host to winless Curry College this weekend — two squads will make it into next week’s postseason championship.
Alex Kravchuk topped the Nor’easters with 20 points, largely behind 7-of-10 shooting from the floor. Daron Hoges, Jr. pumped in 12 points, and Ryan Beatty went 9-of-9 at the line in the 2nd period to end with 11 more. Jackson McCoy drained a trio of trifectas following the break to total nine points. Drew Patno corralled a team-high seven rebounds.
For the contest, UNE knocked down 13-of-34 from behind the arc, while the Leopards only connected on 2-of-20 from deep. The visitors also registered 24 points off 23 WIT turnovers.
Leading the way for Wentworth was junior Stephen Azums, whose 27-point, 13-rebound performance set him at exactly 1,000 career points. Zach Bergeron contributed 21 points and seven boards for the hosts, who had a commanding 47-31 advantage on the glass.
The Nor’easters raced out to a 19-4 cushion through 7:35 of action, however things were soon knotted at 26-all. UNE never fell behind, though, and sat on a 39-33 edge at intermission.
The margin swelled to 16 (61-45) early in the final frame, before the Leopards closed the gap to six (69-63) just ahead of the midway mark in the stanza. UNE hit five of its next six shots to spread things back into double digits for good (81-67) with under eight minutes to play.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less