
HARPSWELL — Harpswell voters approved both municipal ballot questions Tuesday, transferring $30,000 into the town’s depleted legal fund and appropriating $25,000 toward improving parking at the Pott’s Point boat launch.
Residents supported adding money to the town’s legal fund 1,871 to 1,291, refilling the legal coffers after a contentious court dispute with a small group of Harpswell residents who wanted to save the Mitchell Field water tower.
After residents voted at the March town meeting to demolish the water tower, the group petitioned for a revote of the issue. Instead of demolishing the structure, they argued, the town should hand it over to The Friends of Mitchell Field, who could oversee repairs and maintenance while pursuing the possibility of installing cell phone service equipment on the structure.
When Harpswell selectmen rejected their petition, the group sued the town. While the group lost its lawsuit and the tower was torn down in late September, the ensuing legal battle drained the town’s legal fund.
Harpswell had $50,000 reserved for legal costs in 2018. According to Town Administrator Kristi Eiane, the lawsuit cost the town more than $60,000. Tuesday’s vote will allow the town to transfer $30,000 from the unassigned fund balance to the contingency reserve account to cover those unexpected legal fees.
Residents also voted 2,352 to 901 in favor of allocating $25,000 toward improving parking at the Pott’s Point boat launch. That’s in addition to the $25,000 that was already allocated to the project. The total cost of the project is estimated to be $100,000, with the state covering half of the costs through a Small Harbor Improvement grant.
Construction could begin as early as February.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less