Regulators deciding whether Central Maine Power will get a key permit needed to build a 145-mile transmission corridor have extended their process into March.
The Maine Public Utilities Commission ruled Friday that it expects to extend the time for research, testimony and hearings into January, with a date of March 1 now set to wrap up the information-gathering aspect of the permit process.
The PUC is considering whether to award a certificate of public conveyance and necessity, a necessary component of CMP’s plan to deliver hydropower from Quebec to markets in Massachusetts.
The $1 billion proposal has drawn widespread interest and generated more than 300 separate filings and a similar number of public comments in the case. Multiple requests for complex technical data, as well as confidential negotiations aimed at settling narrow aspects of the case, were still in play last month.
Opponents of the plan successfully argued that they and the PUC needed more time to thoroughly vet all the information CMP provided in response to questions about the project. More than 90,000 documents were submitted.
In its order, the PUC said there were questions around engineering and reliability issues, calculation of environmental benefits, and pending legal settlements that needed more time, among other things.
CMP had hoped to have its permit from the PUC by the end of the year. A company spokesman said the delay from the PUC should not affect the planned timeline to begin construction of the project late next year or early 2020.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less