
RICHMOND — Authorities were searching the Kennebec River Friday morning for a Richmond man who was reported missing Thursday night and whose boat was found, running and unoccupied, aground on Swan Island.

Mark Johnston, 64, was reported overdue at 9:21 p.m. Thursday after he had gone out onto the river with plans to take his boat from a mooring on the river to the Richmond town docks, so it could be hauled out of the river on Friday.
A search got underway Thursday night and his 32-foot recreational motor boat was found by Maine Marine Patrol officer Clint Thompson, aground, downriver from Richmond on the west side of Swan Island, with its engine running and navigational lights on. No one was on board, according to Jeff Nichols, spokesman for the Maine Marine Patrol.
Johnston was last observed on a security camera arriving at the town dock at 6:11 p.m. Thursday, according to Marine Patrol investigators.
Searchers including firefighters from Dresden, Woolwich, and Bowdoinham as well as the Marine Patrol, Richmond Police, the Richmond Harbormaster, a 29-foot US Coast Guard Vessel, and a Coast Guard helicopter out of Cape Cod searched the river by air, land and water overnight until about 2:30 a.m. when the search was suspended. It resumed this morning.
A Marine Patrol airplane circled over the river Friday morning as part of search efforts, as well.
Nichols said State Police and Marine Patrol divers were on the scene Friday morning, using a side scan sonar device to look underwater, near the town docks in Richmond.
He said Johnston had indicated his plans were to move his vessel from its mooring to the Richmond docks around 6:15 p.m. Thursday so it could be hauled out Friday.
His vehicle was discovered parked near the town boat launch Thursday after he was reported overdue.
His daughter, Sarah Johnston, said her father was thought to be wearing jeans and an old green jacket, likely with a hooded sweatshirt underneath, when he went missing.
This story will be updated.

Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less