SOUTH HIRAM
Brynn Hink’s two-run first-inning homer provided a quick lead, and Lakyn Hink laced a three-run double during an eight-run third as second seeded Sacopee Valley (16- 2) downed third-seeded Lisbon (13-5), 12-2, in a Class C South high school softball semifinal on Saturday.
Brenna Humphrey and Brynn Hink had two hits each for Sacopee, which will meet top-ranked Madison (18-0) in the regional final at 7 p.m. Tuesday at St. Joseph’s College.
Lisbon trailed 2-0 after Hink’s homer, but cut the deficit in half in the third before the Hawks put the game away in the bottom of the frame.
Giana Russo singled and doubled in the loss, while Ivy Morris lifted a home run for the Greyhounds.
New England Track
DURHAM, N.H. — The University of New Hampshire was the site for Saturday’s 73rd edition of the New England Interscholastic Track & Field Championships.
Several area athletes competed in the event.
In the boys competition, Brunswick’s Samuel Cenescar and Mt. Ararat’s Lisandro Berry-Gaviria had solid showings, with Cenescar clearing the high jump bar at 6-05 for seventh, while Berry- Gaviria, running in the 1,600- meter race, claimed ninth in 4:23.48.
Brunswick’s William Shaughnessy finished 22nd in the 3,200 and helped the Dragons’ 4 x 800 relay squad (Daniel Lyons, Tyler Patterson, Cam Ashby, Shaughnessy) to a 27th-place showing in 8:43.49.
Wiscasset’s Matthew Chapman was 26th in the 110 hurdles (17.11), while Mt. Ararat’s Max Spelke claimed 23rd in the javelin (149-04).
Freeport long-distance runner Lily Horne ran in two events on the girls side. She was 15th in the 1,600 in 5:17.93 and 22nd in the 3,200 (11:38.80).
Mt. Ararat’s Katie Lynch took 21st in the 200 (27.23), Maddie Wayne of Brunswick was 27th in the 800 (2:28.43), and the Mt. Ararat 4 x 800 relay foursome of Sara York, Katherine Leckbee, Anna Harbo and Camila Ciembroniewicz placed 30th in 10:25.98.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less