FREEPORT
The Freeport High School boys tennis team, seeded second in Class B South, rolled to a 5-0 quarterfinal win over No. 7 York on Thursday.
The Falcons are slated to host No. 3 Yarmouth on Saturday (time TBA) in the semifinals.
Wes Goodwin and Clay Canterbury won easily at No. 1 and 2 singles, respectively. Goodwin downed Dinon Hughes, 6-2, 6-1, while Canterbury swept his way to a 6-0, 6-0 win over John Welch.
Liam Gould defeated Brian Cronin of York at No. 3 singles, 6-4, 6-3.
Doubles was much closer, with both matches going three sets. Aaron Rusiecki and Thomas Whelan won, 4-6, 6-3, 6-3, against Wildcats Benjamin
Duffy and Thomas Donnelly at No. 1 doubles, while at No. 2 doubles the Freeport duo of Sullivan Smith and Liam Hornchild- Bear defeated Garrett Cronin and Dillon Brodsky, 6-4, 6-7 (6), 6-1.
Freeport faced Yarmouth on May 7, downing the Clippers, 4-1.
Class C South boys
Both Lisbon and Wiscasset advanced to the quarterfinals, facing tough road tests.
The Wolverines, seeded seventh, fell to No. 2 Hall-Dale, 5- 0.
The closest match came at No. 1 singles, where Wiscasset’s Sam Strozier won the second set to get even with Hall-Dale’s MacKenzie Creamer, who went on to win the match, 6-4, 4-6, 6-0.
Hall-Dale received wins from Isaac Lawrence (No. 2 singles over Jesse Perkins), Eli Spahn (No. 3 singles over Benjamin Masten), and Neil Stottler and Ian McNaughton (No. 1 doubles over Trinin Jeffrey and Dylan Orr).
The Wolverines forfeited at No. 2 doubles and finished their season with a 3-8 record.
Lisbon struggled against top-ranked Waynflete, falling 5-0. The Flyers won each set by 6-0 scores.
Playing for the Greyhounds (1-10) were Alex Wells, Gerrit Smith, Ben James, Zach Barry, Dustin Verrill, Dan Poulin and Christian Richter.
Softball
FARMINGDALE — Lisbon used a four-run fourth inning to take control en route to a 10-0 Mountain Valley Conference win over Hall-Dale on Wednesday.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less