
Court officials say Carlton Young’s trial has been moved to March 19. It had been scheduled to begin on Wednesday.
Young pleaded not guilty to felony murder in the death of 62-year-old Connie Loucks of Wells. Authorities say Loucks suffered a heart attack after Young allegedly knocked on her door and windows in 2015.
Young, of Sanford, has also been accused of being part of a burglary ring in southern Maine.
An affidavit filed with the court by Wells Police Det. Todd Bayha in April 2015, outlined the initial burglary at the Loucks’ residence on Wire Road, and the subsequent burglary attempt the following day.
According to the affidavit, Connie Loucks reported to police that she had returned home to discover several pieces of jewelry missing from her home, which her husband later valued at more than $10,000. She told police the home was unlocked, and that she hadn’t authorized entry to anyone.
When reporting the burglary, Loucks asked the police officer how burglars would approach a home, and was told that they would usually bang on doors and windows to determine of anyone was inside. If someone was at home, they would make up an excuse and leave, according to the court document.
The following day, police received a call from Loucks at 12:32 p.m. She told them she believed the burglars had returned.
“She stated they were banging on the windows and doors of the residence, and when she asked them what they wanted, they stated they were looking for ‘Billy,’” Bayha wrote in the affidavit.
At 12:41 p.m., Loucks’ daughter called police and said she had been on the phone with her mother “about the men being at her house,” when the phone went dead.
At 1 p.m., police forced their way into the home and saw Loucks unresponsive on the couch. They attempted life-saving measures, to no avail. She was pronounced dead at the scene.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less