BANGOR — Maine voters approved a constitutional amendment to double the amount of time state pension managers have to compensate for losses, according to a projection by The Associated Press.
With 52 percent of precincts reporting at 9:50 p.m. Tuesday, vote tallies showed support for the constitutional change at 62 percent and opposition at 38 percent.
The change voted on Tuesday would provide a 20-year amortization period, doubling the time the state has to catch up after market losses. That will reduce big swings in what the state pays into the system year to year.
The retirement system stewards an investment pool for more than 70,000 government employees, teachers and retirees. The system is funded by contributions from members and appropriations from state government. The state’s payments to the system have ranged from nearly $400 million in 1995 to around $320 million in 2017.
Strict measures put in place when the retirement system was nearing insolvency in the early 1990s mean the state and system must compensate for dips in the investment markets within 10 years. That’s more of a state burden than it used to be because the size of the pension system’s investment pool is $10 billion now, compared with $3 billion then.
Sandy Matheson, executive director of the Maine Public Employees Retirement System, said she was “delighted.”
“This will lessen the burden on the state of Maine if and when another economic downturn happens,” said Matheson in a prepared statement. “We know this is an unusual issue for voters, and thank everyone that took the time to study and vote on this referendum.”
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less