That means that the city will have to meet with the contractor, Peter Petit Landscaping, to modify the scope of work on the project, said City Manager Steve Buck. The City Council awarded the bid to Petit at a council meeting Oct. 31.
Last week, landlord Christopher Eric Farris appeared on the property with an excavator, said Buck. But Farris, who represents 33 Island Ave. owner Harry Farris, hadn’t come prepared with permits necessary to get the work done.
Both 33 Island Ave., which is owned by Farris, and 35 Island Ave., owned by York County Community Action Corporation, were demolished following the fire because of safety reasons — both buildings were extensively gutted in the blaze. The resulting debris is co-mingled on both properties. YCCAC signed a consent agreement with the city to pay for its share of the demolition costs and removal.
Buck said Farris was issued a stop work order. Then, city personnel worked with him to ensure he had the permits necessary to do the work.
On Thursday afternoon, an excavator was on the property, removing debris.
Buck said Farris told him he plans to renovate 28 Thompson St., a single-family dwelling next to the 33 Island Ave. property that sustained some damage in the fire. However the City Council on Oct. 23 deemed it to dangerous and a nuisance as defined by state law. Farris has 30 days to appeal the decision.
The property has holes in the roof, heavy water damage, broken windows, and hasn’t had water service since 2011.
Farris has said both 28 Thompson St. and 33 Island Ave. are self-insured.
Cause of the fire is undetermined, but State Fire Marshal Joe Thomas said it is believed to have started on the first or second floor porch at 33 Island Ave.
— Senior Staff Writer Tammy Wells can be contacted at 324-4444 (local call in Sanford) or 282-1535, ext. 327 or twells@journaltribune.com.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less