CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — A mistrial has been declared in the case of three men accused of attacking NASCAR driver Mike Wallace and his daughter after a June concert in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Local news outlets report that Judge Ronald Chapman declared the mistrial Wednesday after learning two potential witnesses were in the courtroom when testimony began. Judges and attorneys don’t want potential witnesses to hear anything that might influence their own testimony.
A spokeswoman for the Mecklenburg County District Attorney’s Office said prosecutors will retry the case.
The witnesses involved were Robert Wood, who was with Wallace the night of the concert and took part in the fight, and Joshua Bluchar, a PNC Amphitheater employee who came upon the fight as he was leaving work. Both were expected to give key testimony in the trial.
Wood and Bluchar have been charged with civil contempt of court and will go before the judge next month. The judge had warned all potential witnesses to stay out of the courtroom.
When Assistant District Attorney William Biggers learned the men were in the courtroom, he told defense lawyers, who requested a mistrial.
Wallace and his daughter Lindsey were hospitalized after a fight following the June 17 Rascal Flatts concert.
Wallace attorney Jon Burns said the family “is disappointed that there was a mistrial, and they look forward to having their day in court.”
Paul Lucas is charged with assault inflicting serious injuries, assault on a female, and assault and battery. Nathan Lucas is accused of assault inflicting serious injury, and assault and battery.
Randolph Mangum is charged with simple assault and assault inflicting serious injury. The three pleaded not guilty before the trial started.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less