I write to encourage readers to support ranked-choice voting, a system that determines the winner of a race where no candidate initially receives 50 percent, plus one of the votes cast. Ranked-choice voting has been used for years in municipal elections in other states, and in federal elections in other nations. Public satisfaction has been high.
Ranked-choice voting ensures winners will have majority support, and would eliminate any need for runoff elections, which are time consuming and very expensive. The towns and cities of Maine have better uses for their tax payer dollars than holding runoff elections.
Our current system of plurality voting has resulted in nine of the last 11 gubernatorial elections being won with less than majority support. Maine did not hold runoff elections in these races. Ranked choice voting would have created a more representative democracy, without the high cost of runoff elections.
This November, Mainers will have the opportunity to approve ranked-choice voting at the polls.
I urge readers to learn more about ranked-choice voting by visiting www.rcvmaine.com/FAQ.
Adair DeLamater,
Bath
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less