The problem with the revelation that the United States failed to quickly process key intelligence about Syria’s gas attack is less about what happened in Syria — although that is horrifying — as it is about the state of U.S. intelligence capacity 12 years after the 9/11 terror attacks. We are still not where we need to be.
The story in the weeks after the 2001 attacks was that various parts of the American intelligence infrastructure had information that could have been used to predict or at least suspect that an attack was impending. But there was a failure to connect the dots, in part because the intelligence system was fractured and even competitive. The swift creation of the overarching Department of Homeland Security was supposed to rectify that problem.
Clearly, more needs to be done.
There was no public explanation for the delay in processing the intelligence from Syria, but current and former intelligence officials told the Associated Press that analysts were stretched too thin with the multiple streams of intelligence coming out of multiple conflict zones, from Syria to Libya to Yemen.
Given that failure, it is necessary to ask a troubling question: What if the threat had been against American interests, even an attack on American soil?
The problem was spelled out last month in top-secret government documents acquired by the Washington Post from former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden. According to the “black budget” summary, spy agencies remain unable to provide critical information to the president on many national security threats, despite the massive buildup of intelligence capacity.
The point of reorganizing the American intelligence structure wasn’t simply to expand the reach of spying, but to streamline the processing and sharing of information. That also isn’t happening sufficiently.
What is more, it is a fair interpretation that the country is not getting its money’s worth. According to the documents Snowden leaked, U.S. intelligence spending has doubled since 2001. The country’s 16 spy agencies have together requested $56 billion in their 2013 budget.
This doesn’t mean the agencies are failing. There have been no successful foreign attacks on U.S. soil since 9/11, although there have been internal acts of terrorism, including the bombings at this year’s Boston Marathon. Some of that success, including a thwarted attack on the New York City subway system, is directly due to the work of U.S. intelligence agencies.
But the inability to puzzle out the impending gas attack in Syria in time to do something should be a wake-up call to Congress and the Obama administration.
We have already learned the costs of failure.
— The Buffalo (N.Y.) News
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less