Maine Trout Unlimited Council provided additional funding support. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Gulf of Maine Coastal Program provided surveying support for the project, Maine Rivers assisted with project coordination. The prime contractor was Caribou Springs LLC of Gilead.
A dam had been located on the site since 1796, possibly earlier, and had supported both lumber and grist mills in its day. It had continued to operate into the 1950s. The mill itself quickly deteriorated – not a stick of the mill structure remained. The dam had been partially breached in the mid-1990s by high water.
Sebago Trout Unlimited President Patrick O’Shea said, “We are proud to have reconnected three miles of stream habitat to Chandler Brook and the main stem of the Royal River. Fish need to be able to freely move through watersheds to be able to reach spawning, nursery and feeding areas – and survive low water conditions. Even the breached dam was a problem during lower flows.”
Dam owner Fred Fauver said, “The dam no longer served any useful purpose, and was both a liability and an obstruction to the free movement of aquatic life up and down the watershed. The man-made obstruction has been removed, and we all can’t wait to see how Mother Nature details the now free-flowing stream.”
TU Project Coordinator Steve Heinz said, “My most gratifying moment came just as the heavy equipment was finishing up when I saw two small fish swimming upstream. May they be the first of many. The Royal River watershed has such great potential: It even had an Atlantic salmon run before the lower river was dammed in the 1840s. The two head-of-tide dams in Yarmouth are one of the worst things that you can do ecologically to the river system. They are keeping sea-run fish out of the watershed and this impacts everything up stream. We hope the people of Yarmouth will be good stewards and decide that it’s time for those dams to go.”
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less