Judging from some of the goodies quietly tucked into the “fiscal cliff ” agreement, some Washington lawmakers are driving public policy like madmen and don’t belong behind the wheel of anyone’s economy.
Let’s start, since it’s so near and dear in this neck of the woods, with NASCAR. Formally called The American Taxpayer Relief Act, the fiscal cliff deal earmarks an estimated $70 million over the next two years in tax breaks for the upkeep of “motorsports entertainment complexes.”
This means racetrack owners get to depreciate assets such as tracks and bleachers at a faster rate than other businesses. This permits those owners to deduct more expenses, reducing their taxes.
The International Speedway Corp., which owns and runs 13 NASCAR tracks, has spent more than $1.1 million lobbying Congress for the breaks over the last five years. Supporters of the incentive contend that it will “maintain the current standard expected by our competitors and fans.”
Not on the taxpayers’ dime it shouldn’t. And especially not in a deal that is supposed to lead the way to more grown-up legislation and some sense of fiscal prudence.
The NASCAR perks were hardly the only ones slipped into the 157-page fiscal cliff deal. Others included up to $15 million in breaks for television and movie producers who shoot their shows and movies in the United States.
Then there was $4 million over the next two years for folks who buy two- and threewheeled electric vehicles, as in Segways.
And $222 million over two years for a provision that rebates most federal taxes to subsidize rum production.
And, of course, $59 million in tax credits for algae farmers and $15 million in breaks for asparagus growers.
If the fiscal cliff deal really is a first important step toward a sober discussion of spending cuts and a more sensible tax code, we just stumbled our way out of the gate.
— News & Record of Greenville (N.C.)
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less