A protracted fight among the town, state and Midcoast Regional Redevelopment Authority over whether to extend tax breaks for Kestrel Aircraft is not helpful.
We’ve already seen where lack of coordination leads: Last year, Kestrel pulled plans to make planes here, partly because another state was better organized.
Should Kestrel get another tax break? We tend to take a dim view of most corporate handouts (and note that the kestrel, in nature, is a rather predatory bird).
But the real issue is this: The state, town and MRRA must finally figure out how to talk to each other in charting a flight plan for Brunswick Landing — and soon.
In particular, the state and MRRA should dedicate itself to recruiting board members from Brunswick and Topsham with experience in development and job creation. Those without that experience should be replaced.
Only then can we be sure that local economic concerns are paramount. Right now, we’re not.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less