REFERENDUMS ______
Q. 1 — Gay Marriage
YES ……….53%
NO ………….47%
Q. 2 — Education
YES ……..50%
NO ………….50%
Q. 3 — Conservation
YES ……….61%
NO ………….39%
Q. 4 — Infrastructure
YES ……….73%
NO ………….27%
Q. 5 — Water
YES ……….64%
NO ………….36%
PRESIDENT________
BARACK OBAMA (D)……………..57%
MITT ROMNEY (R)………………41%
CONGRESS________
Senate
DANNY DALTON (I) ……………….1%
CYNTHIA DILL (D) ………………13%
ANDREW IAN DODGE (I) ………….1%
ANGUS KING (I) …………………..53%
CHARLES SUMMERS (R) ……….30%
STEPHEN WOODS (I)……………..1%
1st District, House
CHELLIE PINGREE (D)……………66%
JONATHAN COURTNEY (R) ………34%
2nd District, House
MIKE MICHAUD (D)………………58%
KEVIN RAYE (R)…………………42%
LEGISLATURE ______
Senate District 10
RALPH J. DEAN (R)…………….39%
STANLEY J. GERZOFSKY (D)…….61%
Senate District 17
GARRETT P. MASON (R) ……….49%
COLLEEN J. QUINT (D)……………51%
Senate District 19
SETH A. GOODALL (D) ……………64%
JEFFREY K. PIERCE (R)…………36%
Senate District 20
LESLIE T. FOSSEL (R) ………….50%
CHRISTOPHER K. JOHNSON (D)..50%
House District 53
TIMOTHY I. MARKS (D) ………….52%
RAYMOND A. SOULE (R) ……….48%
House District 60
ANDREW T. MASON (D)………….61%
JEAN A. WOLKENS (R) …………39%
House District 61
STEPHANIE HAWKE (R) …………45%
W. BRUCE MACDONALD (D)……55%
House District 62
JENNIFER DECHANT (D)…………61%
KYLE C. ROGERS (R)…………..39%
House District 63
JOHN J. BOUCHARD (R)………..31%
CHARLES R. PRIEST (D)…………69%
House District 64
KIMBERLY N. OLSEN (R)……….45%
JEREMY G. SAXTON (D)………….55%
House District 65
PETER S. KENT (D)………………..63%
JASON K. WARNKE (R)…………37%
House District 66
GRANT A. CONNORS (R)……….22%
MATTHEA E. DAUGHTRY (D)…….46%
K. FREDERICK HORCH (G)……..33%
House District 67
SETH A. BERRY (D) ……………….63%
COREY N. TROUP (R) ………….37%
House District 104
DALE J. CRAFTS (R)……………..100%
House District 105
ELEANOR M. ESPLING (R)………60%
NICHOLE D. STEVENS (D) ……..40%
House District 106
SARA GIDEON (D)…………………66%
JODY M. JAMES (R) ……………34%
Results are unofficial until certified by the Secretary of State.Some races have as little as 67% of precincts reporting.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less