To the editor:
I want to thank Rep. Kim Olsen of Phippsburg for opposing legislation that could destroy the Land Use Regulation Commission.
LURC serves as the planning board and codes enforcement office for the Maine’s 10.5 million acre Unorganized Territories. Rep. Olsen showed independence and integrity in opposing provisions of LD 1798, a bill that is being heavily promoted by the governor and other leaders of her party.
My consulting forestry business takes me to all the major forest regions of the U.S., east of the Great Plains, and I can confirm that there is no place similar to the remote, extensive forests in the Unorganized Territories of Maine.
Two of the worst elements of the bill before the Maine Legislature would allow elected county commissioners to appoint themselves to LURC, and it would also allow counties in that region to opt out of LURC entirely.
County commissioner campaign contributions from the deep pockets of out-of-state companies, which own most of the northern forest, would effectively allow corporate interests to buy representation and influence on LURC.
Allowing counties to opt out of the LURC jurisdiction is a bad idea because they are not equipped to plan for or politically inclined to manage remote tracts of forest for values of statewide and national significance.
Rep. Olsen has opposed both of these changes, which would likely result in the loss of the Maine Woods as we know them today. I urge her to also oppose substituting the Maine Department of Environmental Protection’s permit process for that of LURC, because the DEP rules do not address the unique character of the northern forest.
Robert Bryan,
Harpswell
letters@timesrecord.com
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less