To the editor:
When the Obama administration’s health-care financing plan was signed into law, President Obama and Congress promised that funds under the new law would not cover abortions.
This has now been proved to be empty rhetoric.
Why? Because the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has mandated that under the health care law, private health insurance plans must cover the “ full range” of the Federal Drug Administration’s approved contraceptives — in which category HHS explicitly included the abortion-inducing drug Ella.
This mandate includes a socalled “ religious employer exemption,” yet the exemption is so narrowly defined that most religious schools, colleges, hospitals and charitable organizations serving the public do not qualify.
Even an expanded definition of “religious employer” would fail to protect non-religiously affiliated organizations, individuals or even religiously affiliated health insurers whose pro-life consciences are nonetheless violated.
This is an unprecedented attack on the freedom of conscience of millions of Americans, eviscerating their freedom of choice to purchase private insurance that does not violate their ethical, moral or religious objections.
I hope all readers will contact their elected representatives in Washington, D.C., and voice outrage over this antilife mandate.
J. Roland Morin,
Brunswick
letters@timesrecord.com
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less