RICHMOND, Va. ( AP) — Private, faith-based adoption agencies would be allowed to deny placement of a child if doing so would violate their religious beliefs, including opposition to homosexuality, under legislation advanced by a Virginia House panel.
The Health, Welfare and Institutions Committee voted 14- 5 Tuesday to send Del. Todd Gilbert’s “conscience clause” bill to the House floor. Gilbert, R-Woodstock, said his bill protects religious freedom.
The Virginia Board of Social Services in December adopted regulations that allow discrimination based on personal factors, including gender, age, religion disability, sexual orientation and family status. Gilbert said it’s important to convert those regulations into state law.
Jeff Caruso, representing several Roman Catholic organizations, spoke in favor of the bill. Del. Joe Morrissey, DHenrico, tried to ask Caruso what’s wrong with placing a child with “a loving gay couple,” but the committee chairman intervened.
“For him to have to defend why his church has such a belief, I don’t think that’s appropriate,” said Del. Robert C. Orrock Sr., R-Spotsylvania.
Morrissey urged the committee to reject the bill.
“It strikes me as slightly more than outrageous,” he said. “It’s hurtful, it’s meanspirited, it’s un-Christian.”
Macedonian Orthodox Christian church set alight in latest inter-religious incident
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less