Officials in Regional School Unit 12 hope changes to the eight-town district’s funding formula might quell Wiscasset voters’ desire to explore splitting from the pack.
In a Nov. 8 vote, Wiscasset voted 917 to 220 in favor of exploring the town’s options to withdraw from the district that formed in 2009 as a part of the state-mandated school district consolidation.
On Wednesday, RSU 12 will hold the first of two public hearings on a new cost allocation formula for the towns in the district. The new funding formula would have to be approved by RSU 12 voters by the end of March if the revised plan is to be used in the next fiscal year.
The state consolidation law mandated that the funding scheme adopted with the formation of the district remain constant for two-and-a-half years. That interval expired on Jan. 1, according to RSU 12 Superintendent Greg Potter.
During an October meeting about Wiscasset’s consideration of leaving the district, Potter said it “would be sad to miss out on the opportunities” that could be afforded to RSU 12 towns by a change in the cost-sharing formula.
Currently, that formula has Wiscasset paying 38 percent of the overall bill for the district that also includes Alna, Chelsea, Palermo, Somerville, Westport Island, Whitefield, Windsor and Wiscasset.
Jerry Nault, chairman of RSU 12’s Finance Committee, said during that October meeting that any changes to the funding formula would benefit Wiscasset.
“No matter how we run the numbers, Wiscasset wins because simply the historic costs for running the education in (Wiscasset) were much higher than their cohorts on a percentage basis,” Nault said.
The district’s finance committee will host the first of the two public forums to discuss the new funding formulas on Wednesday in the Wiscasset High School library, starting at 7 p.m.
The second forum will be held Jan. 25 at the Windsor School at 7 p.m.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less