To the editor:
In her Jan. 2 letter to the editor, (“Bullied by NNEPRA”), Julie Wise invited readers to personally view a “clear cut” area behind the homes on Bouchard Drive.
As I have done many times before, I not only drove to the area but walked through the still lovely woods and along the tracks.
The so-called “clear cut” is merely the area on the opposite side of the tracks from the Bouchard neighborhood, where a great deal of scrub growth had colonized the disused rail yard, an area identified on every NNEPRA presentation for more than a year as the locus of the new overnight facility and the additional tracks that will serve it.
I won’t take space here to refute Ms. Wise’s other preposterous claims, but this “clear cut” claim is so thoroughly misleading that I feel compelled to write.
The woods behind the homes abutting the tracks retain their mix of evergreens and deciduous trees undisturbed, effectively screening the view of the tracks for a great many residents.
Just what part of someone else’s land does Ms. Wise not understand? Does she really believe that when she purchases a property, she is entitled to force her will regarding scrub growth upon nearby landowners?
Bouchard is, and I believe will continue to be, a lovely place to live. Property values will reflect this desirability when neighbors stop their negative advertising.
They have met the enemy. It is themselves.
Claudia Knox
Brunswick
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less