Now that footage of campus police pepper-spraying nonviolent protesters at the University of California, Davis, has gone viral, the debate about disproportionate law-enforcement responses to civil disobedience can’t wait.
Nearly a dozen students were pepper sprayed by a police lieutenant who seemed to have little regard for the suffering inflicted on the protesters, who weren’t a physical threat to officers or students. Several protesters were taken to the hospital and 10 were arrested.
The UC-Davis students had gathered to support Occupy Wall Street encampments across the country.
Protesters understand that a risk of free speech is getting arrested in demonstrations that disrupt public order. But being arrested for failure to disperse is one thing. Getting peppersprayed in the face, while peaceably assembled, is something else.
The Occupy Wall Street movement generally has been peaceful and orderly. But it has brought out the worst in some police forces.
Municipal and campus authorities have the tough job of balancing freespeech rights of protesters with the rights of others to open access to public places. As police intervene, they must calibrate their response to the behavior they see. But when those who engage in civil protest are calm and orderly, it’s hard to defend brute tactics. To cite a slogan from a past era: The whole world is watching.
— The (Toledo) Blade
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less