The National Oil Spill Commission has come up with a sound proposal for Congress: Enact legislation for safer operation of offshore oil drilling operations.
The commission has completed a comprehensive study of the Deepwater Horizon accident, and the massive spill that followed. The 380-page report begins with a minute-by-minute review of the events leading up to the blowout, and describes the consequences of what President Obama called the worst environmental disaster we have yet faced.
Oil washed up along more than 650 miles of coastal land, and the environmental damage ashore and at sea is still being tallied. An accounting of the economic damage, particularly to tourism and commercial fishing, is also still underway.
But the extent of the damage makes a compelling case for new safety standards and better regulation of the industry. The commission recommends, for instance, the creation of an independent safety agency within the Department of the Interior. Such independence would insulate regulatory officers from the pressure from industry and government to raise production.
Related proposals call for more funding and additional time for regulatory review, and legislative changes that allow for a more thorough approach to environmental assessments. The commission also urged a change in a liability cap, which limits a company’s damages to $75 million in the event of a disaster.
Better oil spill planning was urged as well, and the commission called for a comprehensive restoration effort that should be undertaken in Gulf Coast areas.
The new Republican chairmen of several House committees have already signaled that new regulation of the oil and gas industry will not be their top priority. We hope the comprehensive accounting of the failures behind the Gulf oil spill will help overcome such resistance.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less