Voters in next week’s primary election have the responsibility of narrowing the field of candidates running for governor. It will be a key step in making the transition to a new administration next year.
Republicans face a choice of seven candidates, while Democrats will choose among four. The winners will appear on the Nov. 2 ballot.
Although some candidates are emphasizing their lack of political baggage, we believe voters should nominate candidates who are well-schooled in the practical problems of government.
Among the Democrats, we support Elizabeth “Libby” Mitchell because she is well-prepared for the difficulties Maine faces. As current Senate president, she helped build the consensus needed to pass two budgets and put important bond proposals before the voters.
She served 18 years in the Maine House, becoming speaker of the house, as well as six years in the Maine Senate. Both Patrick McGowan and G. Steven Rowe also have solid experience in government, but this year Mitchell had the opportunity to show she can overcome difficulties and get results.
She has outlined promising approaches for improving education and expanding access to health care. Her plan for economic growth relies on the strengths of Maine resources, workers and businesses. And her progressive approach to government is flexible enough to allow for the compromises required by politics.
Her practical experience also included terms as a Vassalboro Selectman and chairmanship of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. In the 1990s, she chaired the committee that reformed Maine’s dysfunctional Workers’ Compensation system.
On the Republican side, our choice is S. Peter Mills, a lawyer and state senator with 16 years of legislative experience. His hard work and deep understanding of public policy issues make him an natural choice at a time when the state is struggling to make the best use of limited resources.
The details of his policy proposals are readily available at his campaign website. Although some Republicans consider him too moderate, his emphasis on prudent and accountable government are likely to make him an attractive choice for Democrats as well as Republicans.
He’s run for governor before, losing to Chandler Woodcock in the Republican primary in 2006. This time, Republican voters should take advantage of a candidate whose fiscally conservative views match up well with his practical political skills.
A final choice will await voters in November, but Democratic and Republican voters next week have the opportunity to narrow a field that includes some excellent candidates.
— Comments? Contact Managing Editor Nick Cowenhoven by calling 282-1535, Ext. 327, or via e-mail at nickc@journaltribune.com.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less